DIVORCE LAWYER IN TRENTON
Wayne Oakland Macomb Counties
When the court is evaluating a child custody case, the Friend of the Court assists with this process. When completing an evaluation for custody, the evaluator may meet with the parents together or separately. Each friend of the court office has its own policy on scheduling custody evaluation interviews. Read more about what is involved with the Friend of the Court child custody evaluation.
With two exceptions, a parent may move a child to another location. The first is that each court order granting custody must provide that a parent who has custody of a child may not change the child’s permanent residence from the state of Michigan until the judge approves of the move. The second is that each court order granting custody or parenting time must provide that parents who have custody or parenting time may not move more than 100 miles from their current residence without the approval of the judge.
A parent does not have to request that a judge approve a proposed move to another place in Michigan if:
• The other parent agrees to the move.
• The judge ordered sole custody to one of the child’s parents.
• The parents were already living 100 miles apart when the judge decided custody.
• The move results in the child’s 2 legal residences being closer to each other than before
However, if the custodial parent wants to move the child to another state, even if it is closer than 100 miles from the other parent’s residence, the judge must approve the move.
A parent can get the judge to approve the move in one of two ways. The parent can ask the other parent to agree to the move or the parent can ask the judge to enter an order approving the move. If the parents agree, the friend of the court or an attorney can prepare an order containing their agreement.
The order should state:
• The address where the child will reside.
• Any changes in parenting time or transportation made necessary by the move. If the parents don’t agree, the parent must file a formal request, called a motion, asking the judge to approve the move. The motion should say why the judge should approve the move. Usually these reasons are related to finding a job for the parent or the parent’s spouse, being closer to family members, or classes. The judge may ask the friend of the court to evaluate the request and make a recommendation. The judge may hold a hearing where both parents can tell the judge what they think the judge should do.
The judge must decide the following:
• Whether the legal residence change has the capacity to improve the quality of life for both the child and the relocating parent. This means that the judge must have enough information to show that the move will improve both the child’s and the parent’s life.
CONTACTING AN ATTORNEY: Parents who want to change the custody in a court order may contact an attorney. Attorneys can file motions for changes in custody on behalf of their clients.
Some friend of the court offices will prepare a legal agreement (called a stipulation or consent order) for a change in custody. The agreement can be a result of mediation or a written agreement that is signed by both parents and submitted to the friend of the court office. Parents should check with their friend of the court office regarding office policy for preparing stipulations and consent orders.
The degree to which each parent has complied with, and utilized court order parenting time with the child, and whether the parent’s plan to change the child’s legal residence is inspired by that parent’s desire to defeat or frustrate the parenting time schedule. This means judges must decide if each parent has followed the court order regarding custody and parenting time and how each has used that time with the child.
A judge must also determine if the parent is asking to move just to reduce the child’s opportunity to spend time with the other parent.
• The degree to which the judge is satisfied that, if permitting the legal residence change, if it is possible to order a modification of the parenting time schedule and other arrangements governing the child’s relationship between the child and each parent, and whether each parent is likely to comply with the modification. The judge must decide if each parent will still have the opportunity to have a good relationship with the child and if each parent will do what the judge orders.
• The extent to which the parent opposing the legal residence change is motivated by a desire to secure a financial advantage with respect to a support obligation. The judge must be convinced that the parent opposing the move is not doing so as a means to negotiate paying less child support.
When parents who have custody or parenting time ask a judge to approve a move of 100 miles or more from the parent’s residence the judge must also consider the following:
• Domestic violence, regardless of whether the violence was directed against or witnessed by the child.
The judge must determine if the child has been a victim of domestic violence or witnessed domestic violence, and whether that domestic violence should be a factor in approving the move or changing parenting time. If a parent seeking to change that legal residence needs to seek a safe location from the threat of domestic violence, the parent may move to such a location with the child until the court makes a determination.
4) The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment, and the desirability of maintaining continuity.
5) The permanence, as a family unit, of the existing or proposed custodial home or homes.
6) The moral fitness of the parties involved.
7) The mental and physical health of the parties involved.
8) The home, school, and community record of the child.
9) The reasonable preference of the child, if the court considers the child to be of sufficient age to express preference.
10) The willingness and ability of each of the parties to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child relationship between the child and the other parent or the child and the parents.
11) Domestic violence, regardless of whether the violence was directed against or witnessed by the child.
12) Any other factor considered by the court to be relevant to a particular child custody dispute.
The court has broad discretion in determining the relative weight or importance given to each of the 12 factors. Please keep in mind that disputes over child custody are very disruptive to all concerned, especially the children. Child custody fights are also very expensive, often exceeding $20,000 in attorney fees, expert witness fees and costs.
Memories are priceless. Especially with your child growing up. This is the time when values are instilled for a lifetime.
DISCLAIMER: Regarding this CHILD CUSTODY PAGE / THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT WEBSITE /links and information (In addition to the website disclaimer below). We make periodic updates to this page, links and our entire website. However, we are not responsible for "real time updates" or informational errors. Be sure to click on the following link on the "official" FRIEND OF THE COURT / THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT WEBSITE for current information updates in "real time". Nichols & Eberth and the webmaster/designer are not liable for any of the information/links on this page.
SOLE CUSTODY: There is no legal definition for sole custody. For the purpose of the Michigan Custody Guideline, sole custody occurs when primary physical custody and legal custody are given to one parent.
PHYSICAL CUSTODY: Is when a parent provides most of the day to day care for the child.
LEGAL CUSTODY: Is when a parent has the responsibility of making all major decisions regarding the child’s upbringing (such as medical treatment, school enrollment, religious instruction, and participation in extracurricular activities).
If the judge believes the parents cannot work together for the benefit of their child, sole custody is usually awarded to one parent. The other parent may be given parenting time, as determined by the court. If parenting time is ordered, the non-custodial parent is responsible for making routine and emergency decisions for the child during parenting time.
JOINT CUSTODY: Either parent can make a request and the court must consider ordering joint custody. If the parents agree on joint custody, the court must order it unless the court determines that joint custody is not in the best interests of the child. When deciding, judges must state on the record their reasons for granting or denying the request. Judges may consider joint custody without a parent’s request. In addition to the normal factors considered when deciding custody, with joint custody judges must also consider whether the parents will be able to cooperate and generally agree concerning important decisions affecting the welfare of the child.2 The statute defines joint custody in a way which provides for joint legal custody, joint physical custody, or a combination of joint legal and joint physical custody.
JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY: Means that there will be specific times when each parent will have the child with them. However, it does not mean the parents will necessarily share decision-making authority unless the judge also has ordered joint legal custody. As an example of joint physical custody, one parent could have physical custody during the school year, alternate weekends, and alternate holidays, with the other parent having physical custody during the summer months, alternate weekends, and alternate holidays. If the judge awards joint physical custody, the court order will usually include a statement regarding when the child shall reside with each parent. The court order may provide that physical custody be shared by the parents to make sure the child has contact with both parents. During the time a child resides with a parent, that parent decides all routine and emergency matters concerning the child.
JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY: Joint legal custody means that parents share decision-making authority as to the important decisions affecting the welfare of the child. Joint custody does not depend on the amount of time the child is with each parent.
THIRD PERSON CUSTODY: According to the law a third party means any individual other than a parent. A guardian or limited guardian of a child has standing to bring an action for custody. A limited guardian of a child does not have the right to ask for custody if the parent or parents of the child have done what the judge ordered (substantially complied) during the guardianship placement plan. For additional information regarding guardianships, the circuit court and the probate court (please refer to the Child Custody Act.) in addition to a guardian, a third person may bring an action for custody of a child if the judge finds either of the following:
BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:
• The child was placed for adoption with the third person under the adoption laws of this state or another state, and the placement order was still in effect at the time the action was filed. This means there was a court order placing a child with a third party, and before the court order expired the third party who had temporary custody filed a motion (a formalrequest with the court) for permanent custody.
• After the placement, the child resided with the third person for a minimum of 6 months.
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
• The biological parents were never married to one another.
• The child’s parent who has custody of the child dies or is missing and the other parent has not been granted legal custody under court order.
• The third person is related to the child within the fifth degree by marriage, blood or adoption.
There is certain information that must be presented to the court by a third person or an attorney representing the third person when seeking custody of a child. A person should review the Child Custody Act, or ask an attorney about this information.
Child custody is one of the most emotional and traumatic issues in any divorce case. The “Child Custody Act” sets forth 12 factors that a judge must consider when making a custody decision. In determining which parent shall have custody of the minor children, the court focuses on what is in the child’s best interest (not what is in the parent’s best interest).
The court will take into account the following:
1) The love, affection, and other emotional ties existing between the parties involved and the child.
2) The capacity and disposition of the parties involved to give the child love, affection, and guidance and to continue the education and raising of the child in his or her religion or creed, if any.
3) The capacity and disposition of the parties involved to provide the child with food, clothing, medical care or other remedial care recognized and permitted under the laws of this state in place of medical care, and other material needs.
The chief circuit court judge may appoint a domestic relations referee to hear any motion in a domestic relations matter (with the exception of a change in spouse support). Read more on the difference of a judge and referee
There are many kinds of custody arrangements. For any arrangement, the court decides who will make the major decisions about each child. The court also decides how much time the child will spend with each parent.
Parents are encouraged to reach their own custody agreements. When parents cannot agree, the court analyzes the “best interests of the child” factors listed in the Michigan Child Custody Act at a hearing, during which the parents may present evidence and arguments about each factor.
At a parent’s request, the court must consider ordering joint custody. “Joint custody” means either the child resides alternatively for specific periods with each parent, or the parents share decision-making authority for important decisions affecting the welfare of the child, or both.If both parents agree to a joint custody arrangement, the court must order it unless the court determines that joint custody is not in the “best interests of the child.” The court must state its reasons for granting or denying the request for joint custody. The court may also consider joint custody even if neither parent has requested it. A court must consider both the “best interests” factors and also whether the parents will be able to cooperate and usually agree on important decisions affecting their child’s welfare. If the court determines that a child’s interests are not adequately represented in the custody proceedings, the court may appoint a lawyer guardian ad litem to represent the child. The court may require the parties to pay the lawyer guardian ad litem’s fees.
The role of the judge in custody hearings judges decide custody matters, not the friend of the court. The friends of the court and domestic relations referees can only make recommendations for orders to judges. The law provides that the best interests of the child must control the judge’s decision in custody disputes. When judges hold custody hearings they review the sum total of evidence presented about the factors of the Child Custody Act to determine the best interests of the child. For judges to make decisions about custody, there must be a hearing unless the parents agree and want the court to sign the agreement (referred to as a stipulation or consent order). Judges will normally sign a stipulation or consent order if they believe independently it is in the best interests of the child. Judges, based on their own findings, must adopt, approve and sign the stipulation or consent order before it becomes an order of the court. Before the hearing, the judge may read the custody evaluation report that was completed by the friend of the court. Judges usually read these reports to get a better understanding of the family’s situation.
During the custody hearing, the judge may listen to witnesses (teachers, friends of the family, counselors, etc.). The judge may also look at other evidence (school, community records, counseling reports, etc.). During many custody hearings, judges speak to the children. Many judges speak to children in their chambers (judge’s office). When judges decide to speak to children in their chambers, sometimes the parents’ attorneys are there and sometimes they are not. A friend of the court custody evaluator may also be present when the judge speaks to the child. Judges will decide who will be present when they interview children. Judges are required to make a record of the interview with children. Judges do not have to tell the parents or their attorneys what the child’s preference was, only that it was considered. The child’s preference does not outweigh all of the other factors of the Child Custody Act. It is only one consideration that is looked at by judges.
If parents disagree with the judge’s decisions, they may appeal the decisions.
An appeal is a formal request to a higher court asking to have the judge’s decision be changed. Appeals in domestic relations cases go to the Michigan Court of Appeals. Parents may ask the judge to review a recent custody decision without appealing the case to a higher court. (See child custody modifications below)
Before ruling on custody, the judge must determine whether an established custodial environment exists. “The law states, The custodial environment of a child is established if over an appreciable time the child naturally looks to the custodian in that environment for guidance, discipline, the necessities of life, and parental comfort. The age of the child, the physical environment, and the inclination of the custodian and the child as to permanency of the relationship shall also be considered.” If the judge determines that a custodial environment has been established, judges can only change custody if it is clear and convincing that there has been significant change in circumstances and that the custody change is in the best interests of the child. It does not have to be clear and convincing to the judge to change custody if no established custodial environment existed. It is important to note that just because a child is living with a parent, that does not necessarily mean that an established custodial environment exists. A parent may have custody, but that does not mean the child looks to only that parent to provide guidance, discipline, the necessities of life, and parental comfort. It should also be noted that both parents may have established custodial environments with the child because they have provided guidance, discipline, the necessities of life, and parental comfort for
Increasingly, parents are choosing to represent themselves in custody actions. If a parent believes the current court order for custody should be changed and does not want to hire an attorney, that parent may request from the friend of the court office a “Pro-Per” Motion (sometimes referred to as a “Pro-Se” Motion). This is a “do-it-yourself” form that allows parents to file a motion (a formal request) for a change in custody. The friend of the court is required to make available these Pro-Per Motions. It also must make available forms for responding to a motion for such a modification without the assistance of legal counsel.
Court staff cannot represent either parent, give legal advice, or assist an individual in deciding what statements should be made to complete the Pro-Per Motion forms. The friend of the court should be able to tell individuals who to contact to get a court hearing. The court clerk can provide information about court schedules, fees, location of hearings, and charges for copying documents. All counties charge a fee to file a motion including a “Pro-Per.” The court clerk can provide the amount of the fee. If a parent is unable to pay the fee, the parent should ask the county clerk for an MC20 Form (Affidavit and Order Suspension of Fees/Costs) , which allows the court to waive the fee. After the motion is filed, parents can hire an attorney, or can decide to represent themselves. When parents decide to represent themselves, they will be held to the same standards as any attorney who practices law. For example, the person will have to serve the other parent with the motion and notice of hearing (this means they must make sure the other parent receives the motion and notice of hearing). Judges or domestic relations referees cannot assist parents who decide to represent themselves in court. Parents who decide to use the “Pro-Per” Motion will be responsible for preparing the court order unless the judge orders otherwise. Therefore, parents who file the motions should listen very carefully and take notes to make sure they understand exactly what the judge has ordered. Parents who prepare the order will have to have the judge sign the order then file the original with the county clerk and send copies to the other parent and to the friend of the court. If a domestic relations referee hears the case, the referee may prepare the order.
Child custody is recognized by the court as a domestic relations matter. The court realizes the importance of ongoing parent relationships and the value of time spent with their children. The highest priority of the court making the decision is whatever is the very best for all children involved. Divorce or a civil partnership separation can be very difficult and traumatic for both children, parents, grandparents and relatives. There are laws to protect custody rights for time well spent with the children in that family. The circuit court is involved with establishing and modifying custody applicable to the Michigan State Law. The 'Friend of the Court' can assist the court by making child custody related recommendations to the court/judge.
Child custody is a term that refers to rights and responsibilities for each parent and child. Custody is a determination of the time a child is going to be with each parent and each parent’s responsibility to make decisions on behalf of the child. See child custody terminology. (under certain circumstances the view of the child can be taken into consideration). Custody can be modified to accommodate significant changes in the lives of the children or the parents involved. (See Child Custody Processes - below on this page.)
Judges can order different custody arrangements. Parents can agree to a custody arrangement and judges will usually sign the court order for the arrangements as long as they believe the agreement is in the best interests of the child. (See more about custody arrangements - below on this page.) Difference between a judge & referee
Nichols & Eberth Law Offices © 2013 All Rights Reserved
GENERAL DISCLAIMER: This entire website should be strictly used as informational purposes only. It is not to be construed as legal advise or as a legal consultation since each individual case is unique. Check this website periodically for updates. Nichols & Eberth Law Offices does not warrant or assume any legal liability for the accuracy, completeness, of information provided.